|
I like the idea, but I think each coalition should be able to make and name their own ranks and choose which powers each rank will have access to.
----
BOW DOWN
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
I like the idea, but I think each coalition should be able to make and name their own ranks and choose which powers each rank will have access to.
Absolutely.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
I like the idea, but I think each coalition should be able to make and name their own ranks and choose which powers each rank will have access to.
I agree with this more
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Hi, I agree 100%. What you are suggesting would provide even more flexibility. I think you would agree that either of these suggestions would be a vast improvement to what we currently have?
----
https://atwar-game.com/user/539231/signature.png
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Hi, I agree 100%. What you are suggesting would provide even more flexibility. I think you would agree that either of these suggestions would be a vast improvement to what we currently have?
Yes.
----
BOW DOWN
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Very nice idea and i agree with its original explanation, i dont agree with clans being able to rename their ranks and assign them roles, here's why: it will be abused by trolls so you will end up with 99% of ranks 'dig bickus' and their role 'rekting', unfortunately, still it would be nice to see clans using their ranks sincerely, like knight rank, lord, duke, noble, depending on the era.
I agree with the proposal for ranks to be the same everywhere and their roles fixed, but maybe not 6, but 2-3 additional. This is especially interesting to me who had its own ranks in my own clans, and i like to read about military ranks used around the world and history.
I also like simplicity in things, so my idea would be something like this:
- Founder
- Leader
- Officer
- Warrant Officer
- Sergeant
Or officers being replaced by Captain and Lieutenant, merely as symbolic to their historic meaning, not real use in modern warfare ('captain of the guard', 'king's right hand man was a lieutenant etc')
And maybe there can be a limit to the ranks in clan; like 10 max sergeants, 5 warrant officers, 2 officers, 1 leader.
----
If a game is around long enough, people will find the most efficient way to play it and start playing it like robots
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Hi and thank you for your comments, they are much appreciated. You and others have demonstrated, by your comments, that there is much interest in this topics, particularly from Coalition Leaders like you and me. You have outlined a number of good suggestions. I thank you for that. Most of us would agree that the status quo is no longer acceptable. The atWar game platform has matured significantly since I became a member in 2014, unfortunately the Leader/Officer structure has not kept pace.
----
https://atwar-game.com/user/539231/signature.png
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Dear Clan, the proposed new officer ranking system has good merit and i feel will provide both opportunity and consistency with structured leadership and clearly demonstrate the leaders commitment to enhance our abilities to assist and resolve any questions / issues arrising within the Clan, we can discuss and suggest the best names/titles/ ranks for this however that matters not the important thing is that the membership know who and for what the rank is designed for RE WHO DO I GO TOO for this situation ?
Also i like the proposal and fully ENDORSE IT!!!
MY PERSONAL preference to ranks
1,Founding Leader Field marshal unless Commodus steps down, this shows the lineage and respect required to members for Him starting the clan.
2, Leiutenant, or general.
3, Warrant officer.
4, sergeant,
5, corporal,
6, private first class or Cadet first class. Cadet first class is possibly best
7 members.
wrapping it up Ranking expanding to suit growth both good and important, names matter little, clear description and understanding of ranks and roles criticaly important.
Kind regards Norbit1, officer
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Thank you Norbit1 for your input and suggestions. Fully agree that the actual titles matter little. The important thing is that any new structure has a clearly defined progression of roles and responsibilities within the coalition. I look forward to more input and suggestions particularly from the atWar management team and other coalition leaders and officers. Let's get this idea out of the planning stage and into the design phase.
----
https://atwar-game.com/user/539231/signature.png
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Hi all, reading this hoping your all covid safe or being safe, Pats on Backs to everyone inputing to good positive progression, can we the current leadership please take a vote on ranks as per the forum post recent and get on with it.
again the number, name/ title maters little, lets defing the roles as per suggested and make this great clan feared by other clans and looked up too by the players generally as something they want to be part of.
warm regards Norbit1.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
So, one additional idea that I have to Expand the Coalition Leader/Officer Structure is to provide rewards and recognition within atWar for players who are leaders, officers etc. Most of us understand that atWar is all about rewards and recognition. For example, when you look at a player's profile, it shows you what rank the player is at, as well as his rank symbol. A similar type thing could also be done to the same effect on the profile page where it displays the player's coalition. So, instead of just naming the coalition that the player is a member of, you could identify that the player is a leader or officer etc. This is just one example. Let me know if you have others?
----
https://atwar-game.com/user/539231/signature.png
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|