Informed Multi-Accounting in CWs
- 1
- 2
Objave: 44
Obiskan od: 145 users
See TLDR (in gold below)
======================================
So for the moment, players should refrain from CW'ing a single player using multi-accounts in CWs.
Even if the single player is informing, it creates a situation where some clans are seeing a disadvantage and negative impact on their seasonal rankings. Perhaps this will change following a discussion, but for now, adhere to the rules.
What follows is the rationale:
At first, a report was received that a player was CW'ing by himself, using multi accounts.
This violates AW rules (4.4 and 4.5). However, the player was informing his opponents. So on the surface, it would appear informing the opponents would satisfy the rule violation and no one would have a problem.
However the problem arises from competitors of the opponents. On one hand, this tactic could be used to 'feed' elo by a single player. THIS is NOT what happened in this case, but it creates a complex issue if solo CWs are permitted. There is a history of this, and it happened when two or three players 'conspired' to feed elo. Now only a single player is all that is required to do this,.
On the other hand, if the single player wins then other clans could consider this a disadvantage, as they could lose standing.
Either way, win or lose, it can create problems for other clans - even if the two clans engaged in the single player CW are above board, legit, and playing with integrity.
====
TLDR summary:
As a result, this is to clarify that until further notice, single player CWs will continue to be against the rules, even if agreed upon by both.
======================================
So for the moment, players should refrain from CW'ing a single player using multi-accounts in CWs.
Even if the single player is informing, it creates a situation where some clans are seeing a disadvantage and negative impact on their seasonal rankings. Perhaps this will change following a discussion, but for now, adhere to the rules.
What follows is the rationale:
At first, a report was received that a player was CW'ing by himself, using multi accounts.
This violates AW rules (4.4 and 4.5). However, the player was informing his opponents. So on the surface, it would appear informing the opponents would satisfy the rule violation and no one would have a problem.
However the problem arises from competitors of the opponents. On one hand, this tactic could be used to 'feed' elo by a single player. THIS is NOT what happened in this case, but it creates a complex issue if solo CWs are permitted. There is a history of this, and it happened when two or three players 'conspired' to feed elo. Now only a single player is all that is required to do this,.
On the other hand, if the single player wins then other clans could consider this a disadvantage, as they could lose standing.
Either way, win or lose, it can create problems for other clans - even if the two clans engaged in the single player CW are above board, legit, and playing with integrity.
====
TLDR summary:
As a result, this is to clarify that until further notice, single player CWs will continue to be against the rules, even if agreed upon by both.
|
Omg atwar players can argue without drama or trash talk omg what happened to my atwar
---- 
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
That happens when no Soyllirian members take part.
---- 
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
And here you are,stop hating Illy D hate never wins anyway
----
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Aint hating just throwing facts outhere
----
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
|
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
iq -3000
----   
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Bro siri is a specialist in being literally an idiot, no offense given, just lack of basic intelligence ik the way he speaks or express himself
---- 
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
ehh such toxic players , whats wrong with me asking about that , i always thought clan wars were supposed to be several clan members fighting another clan... , while duels for games between singular players.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
It's still one group vs another group. You have these 1v1 style "clan wars" in other games as well. Where clans pitch their best against eachother.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
i see , too start these 1vs1 cws each side still needs a officer right , cuz if thats the case then seems fair (since leadership of the clans are leting it start)
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
|
1v1 cws should be allowed, I don't see a reason they shouldn't be. i also want to start 1v1 cwing
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
|
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
"Omg atwar players can argue without drama or trash talk omg what happened to my atwar" I think you just proved Failyer's point Jugers.
---- BOW DOWN
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
|
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
- 1
- 2
