|
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Ivan (Administrator)
See subject
Perhaps you're right.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Prispeval Ivan, 05.12.2010 at 03:25
See subject
Perhaps you're right.
I'm sure I am! ;c)
Maybe just one unit per sub to allow reconnaissance missions but prevent all-out sneak attacks
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Prispeval Ivan, 05.12.2010 at 03:25
See subject
Perhaps you're right.
I'm sure I am! ;c)
4 per sub just as air transports do would be ideal.
Maybe just one unit per sub to allow reconnaissance missions but prevent all-out sneak attacks
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
TP_MLD Objave: 61 od: Nizozemska
|
I was thinking 3 myself. or 2 with a +1 cap upgrade
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Prispeval TP_MLD, 10.12.2010 at 10:50
I was thinking 3 myself. or 2 with a +1 cap upgrade
I think 4 would be the best way to go because it keeps constancy with air transports, the difference between the two being subs can defend themselves but they have more limited movement.
However I dont think a cap upgrade should be implemented to subs if they are given 4.
My two cents.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Ivan (Administrator)
We're considering this, but at rather low priority, you might have to wait.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
See subject
This idea is win, +1.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
Nero Objave: 3756 od: USA
|
Support
----
Laochra¹: i pray to the great zizou, that my tb stops the airtrans of the yellow infidel
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
AlexMeza Račun izbrisan |
Prispeval Nero, 16.02.2014 at 15:46
Support
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|