Eurostan/Eurobad

Just curious you guys seems to be getting slut shamed for your tolerance levels. How many years till you bask In alahs light.

Prispeval Helly, 29.05.2017 at 05:12

Just curious you guys seems to be getting slut shamed for your tolerance levels. How many years till you bask In alahs light.

100-150

Algerian France,pakistani Sweden,turkish Germany

Never will be, if the percentage of Muslims becomes too great there will be reaction.

Good countries like Poland will never allow it to happen

Prispeval Helly, 29.05.2017 at 05:12

Just curious you guys seems to be getting slut shamed for your tolerance levels. How many years till europe basks In alahs light.

What, like it isn't already?

It never will be, come on..

Prispeval Al Fappino, 29.05.2017 at 14:37

It never will be, come on..

I'm sure byzantium thought the same way xD

Prispeval Helly, 29.05.2017 at 19:51

Prispeval Al Fappino, 29.05.2017 at 14:37

It never will be, come on..

I'm sure byzantium thought the same way xD

I'm pretty sure usa thinks the same way too... coincidence?

Prispeval RaulPB, 30.05.2017 at 05:54

Prispeval Helly, 29.05.2017 at 19:51

Prispeval Al Fappino, 29.05.2017 at 14:37

It never will be, come on..

I'm sure byzantium thought the same way xD

I'm pretty sure usa thinks the same way too... coincidence?

I accept the fact that my country is a spec in the history of humanity, the United states is already in its twilight next will come it's fall.

Suffering brings survival, survival makes sure strong genes are passed on and weak ones die off, survival bring creation, creation brings stability and happiness, stability breeds decadence, decadence breeds corruption, corruption breeds down fall, down fall brings suffering, and the cycle continues. You can paste that cycle to every empire that has ever exsisted. The good news is no matter what the land the united states governs over is rich in natural resources so whatever comes after is likely to eventually be prosperous again.

Prispeval Helly, 30.05.2017 at 06:01

I accept the fact that my country is a spec in the history of humanity, the United states is already in its twilight next will come it's fall.

Suffering brings survival, survival makes sure strong genes are passed on and weak ones die off, survival bring creation, creation brings stability and happiness, stability breeds decadence, decadence breeds corruption, corruption breeds down fall, down fall brings suffering, and the cycle continues. You can paste that cycle to every empire that has ever exsisted. The good news is no matter what the land the united states governs over is rich in natural resources so whatever comes after is likely to eventually be prosperous again.

Rich in what natural resources exactly?

Prispeval RaulPB, 30.05.2017 at 06:11

Prispeval Helly, 30.05.2017 at 06:01

I accept the fact that my country is a spec in the history of humanity, the United states is already in its twilight next will come it's fall.

Suffering brings survival, survival makes sure strong genes are passed on and weak ones die off, survival bring creation, creation brings stability and happiness, stability breeds decadence, decadence breeds corruption, corruption breeds down fall, down fall brings suffering, and the cycle continues. You can paste that cycle to every empire that has ever exsisted. The good news is no matter what the land the united states governs over is rich in natural resources so whatever comes after is likely to eventually be prosperous again.

Rich in what natural resources exactly?

timber, fresh water, cattle, agriculture, manufacturing, oil, infrestructure, fertile land copper, salt, iron, coal. Just a few things off the top of my head.

Prispeval Helly, 30.05.2017 at 06:22

timber, fresh water, cattle, agriculture, manufacturing, oil, infrestructure, fertile land copper, salt, iron, coal. Just a few things off the top of my head.

Agriculture, cattle, manufacturing and infraestructure are no natural resources. Fresh water, timber, salt and fertile land are kinda average. Coal is super ineffective compared to petroleum, which you barely have any and for which you're gonna have to destroy half your land and natural resources in order to obtain it. Copper and iron are the only really valuable assets of your list, until you run out of it.

Anyway, sure, gl with starting all over from scratches once your "empire" divides itself into individual states

Prispeval RaulPB, 30.05.2017 at 07:13

Prispeval Helly, 30.05.2017 at 06:22

timber, fresh water, cattle, agriculture, manufacturing, oil, infrestructure, fertile land copper, salt, iron, coal. Just a few things off the top of my head.

Agriculture, cattle, manufacturing and infraestructure are no natural resources. Fresh water, timber, salt and fertile land are kinda average. Coal is super ineffective compared to petroleum, which you barely have any and for which you're gonna have to destroy half your land and natural resources in order to obtain it. Copper and iron are the only really valuable assets of your list, until you run out of it.

Anyway, sure, gl with starting all over from scratches once your "empire" divides itself into individual states

You know what raul, your turning into a real prick. How about you fuck off? Sorry your empire wasn't even the best in its golden era, so you got to be a hater for no reason what so ever. Cattle is a natural resource, manufactoring is a culmination of several natural resources being used to create a product. As for oil we have shit tons, we just prefer to destroy the rest of the world's supply first before we use our own. Coal is a heavy pollutant but if your broke you rather have it then nothing at all. Maybe I should not of said infrestructure as part of that quote but it is indeed correct existing infrestructure makes rebounding easier after a major collapse just ask the UK or Russia. Lastly you ignored my insightful quote about how man will always fall as corruption is our nature. Instead you wanted to have a dick measuring contest about countries. Every single resource europe has, is also in the United states in higher quantities. So piss off

Prispeval Helly, 30.05.2017 at 07:21

You know what raul, your turning into a real prick. How about you fuck off? Sorry your empire wasn't even the best in its golden era, so you got to be a hater for no reason what so ever. Cattle is a natural resource, manufactoring is a culmination of several natural resources being used to create a product. As for oil we have shit tons, we just prefer to destroy the rest of the world's supply first before we use our own. Coal is a heavy pollutant but if your broke you rather have it then nothing at all. Maybe I should not of said infrestructure as part of that quote but it is indeed correct existing infrestructure makes rebounding easier after a major collapse just ask the UK or Russia. Lastly you ignored my insightful quote about how man will always fall as corruption is our nature. Instead you wanted to have a dick measuring contest about countries. Every single resource europe has, is also in the United states in higher quantities. So piss off

LMAO helly, did bringing up an empire from 400 years ago really seem a good idea for your argument on natural resources? why do you even get triggered? how did I hate on you? Fuck off

Definition of Natural Resource: resources that exist without actions of humankind. Therefor, cattle, infrastucture, agriculture and manufacturing aren't. It's a fact....

You may have as many tons of oil as you like, but it's really costly to extract since it's really scattered and the method used to extract it (fracking) is proven to be very harmful.

Agree with that, better have coil than nothing. Yet, it might be considered a pollutant toxic enough to discourage its use or else you might end up like china with its eternal smog and health issues.

Well, I do not completely agree with corruption being part of our nature but our social-economic situation obviously takes us in this path, so I'd agree for the most part with what you said about falling empires.

Again, why the fuck do you get triggered? Point me out any single sentence where I started a dick measuring contest! Keep your dick to yourself, I haven't compared shit. Take a deep breath and do not make up paranoias.....

Prispeval RaulPB, 30.05.2017 at 08:14

LMAO helly, did bringing up an empire from 400 years ago really seem a good idea for your argument on natural resources? why do you even get triggered?

Definition of Natural Resource: resources that exist without actions of humankind. Therefor, cattle, infrastucture, agriculture and manufacturing isn't. It's a fact....

You may have as many tons of oil as you like, but it's really costly to extract since it's really scattered and the method used to extract it (fracking) is proven to be very harmful.

There is a great difference between 100-200 years and 400 years...

Cattle and agriculture, or atleast the potential to develop them, can be considered a natural resource.

Extracting American oil is not that costly and there are already oil operations in Texas and such.

Prispeval Zephyrusu, 30.05.2017 at 08:21

There is a great difference between 100-200 years and 400 years...

Cattle and agriculture, or atleast the potential to develop them, can be considered a natural resource.

Extracting American oil is not that costly and there are already oil operations in Texas and such.

What's the point in discussing the dates? It's not like there was much left of that empire 100 and 200 years ago, but that has nothing to do with natural resources... stay on topic

Again: Definition of Natural Resource: resources that exist without actions of humankind. Soil and natural water sources can be considered natural resources, not cattle nor agriculture! What's the point in discussing about its own definition as a word?

It is highly enviromentally costly. Just check the repercussion of frackin in their soil and water pollution.

Long after USA fails to their natural predator, obesity.

Prispeval Helly, 29.05.2017 at 19:51

Prispeval Al Fappino, 29.05.2017 at 14:37

It never will be, come on..

I'm sure byzantium thought the same way xD

The reasons of why Byzantium fell and what the current society faces (a tendency for a slight increase in islamism in western countries due to multiculturalism and globalization) are completely different.

You can't generalize the "muslimification" of all western countries by picking the examples of Sweden and even Germany, that's not how it works. I can assure you southern european countries for example will not become increasingly muslim and turn muslim completely, for cultural reasons (southern european countries favour a friendly assimilation and miscigenation between peoples: example of Portugal and Spain) or because Greek culture repels it (cuz of Turkey) primarily.

Besides, we all know why countries like Sweden and Germany are taking in thousands and thousands of refugees. It's their only way of dealing with the crisis of an aging population and a possible future bankruptcy of social security and bankruptcy of the State, with a decrease on available manpower in those countries. It has been kind of debunked why Germany welcomes so many refugees and has been welcoming turks. It's because they desperately need more than 1million of new available manpower, to guarantee future economic growth and sustainability and the sustainability of Social Security.

And come on, countries like Portugal and Spain where less than 7% of the population is muslim will never ever have any sizeable amount of muslim communities within their borders. In my country for example, not only muslims are a minority and always will be, our muslim community is deeply entrenched in western values.

Prispeval Al Fappino, 30.05.2017 at 10:22

Prispeval Helly, 29.05.2017 at 19:51

Prispeval Al Fappino, 29.05.2017 at 14:37

It never will be, come on..

I'm sure byzantium thought the same way xD

not only muslims are a minority and always will be, our muslim community is deeply entrenched in western values.

The Quran contradicts 90% of what the West does you cant be deeply entrenched in westren values if you are a muslim.Islam is not competeble with beaing a true muslim

Prispeval Brsjak, 30.05.2017 at 12:38

The Quran contradicts 90% of what the West does you cant be deeply entrenched in westren values if you are a muslim.Islam is not competeble with beaing a true muslim

So, have you read the quran?

Prispeval RaulPB, 30.05.2017 at 12:57

Prispeval Brsjak, 30.05.2017 at 12:38

The Quran contradicts 90% of what the West does you cant be deeply entrenched in westren values if you are a muslim.Islam is not competeble with beaing a true muslim

So, have you read the quran?

Here are some interesting parts of it for you,

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/violence.aspx

Prispeval RaulPB, 30.05.2017 at 12:57

Prispeval Brsjak, 30.05.2017 at 12:38

The Quran contradicts 90% of what the West does you cant be deeply entrenched in westren values if you are a muslim.Islam is not competeble with beaing a true muslim

So, have you read the quran?

you can find verses of it online it is not hard

Prispeval Brsjak, 30.05.2017 at 13:06

you can find verses of it online it is not hard

And do you relate every single word from that to the behaviour of islam followers? Cause I don't and I know some personally. Also, it's not as if the bible didn't have agressive or violent passages, yet you don't think we need to be generally violent...

Anyway, only brainwashed retards take those books so seriously to the point of killing and such.

Prispeval RaulPB, 30.05.2017 at 13:20

Prispeval Brsjak, 30.05.2017 at 13:06

you can find verses of it online it is not hard

And do you relate every single word from that to the behaviour of islam followers? Cause I don't and I know some personally. Also, it's not as if the bible didn't have agressive or violent passages, yet you don't think we need to be generally violent... "I will make my arrows drunk with blood, and my sword shall devour flesh" (Deut. 32:42)

Anyway, only brainwashed retards take those books so seriously to the point of killing and such.

It is a fact that Islam is the most violent religion on Earth they are responsible for most terrorist acts + i dont see muslim apoligist for Islamic Conquests + you found only 1 quote of the Bible beaing violent while the Quran has multiple instances of violent verses in it + i dont see as much Christian terrorist attacks as much as there are Islamic ones + that verse of the bible didnt say anything to enchourege you to kill someone while the Islamic ones clearly do

Prispeval Brsjak, 30.05.2017 at 13:24

It is a fact that Islam is the most violent religion on Earth they are responsible for most terrorist acts + i dont see muslim apoligist for Islamic Conquests + you found only 1 quote of the Bible beaing violent while the Quran has multiple instances of violent verses in it + i dont see as much Christian terrorist attacks as much as there are Islamic ones + that verse of the bible didnt say anything to enchourege you to kill someone while the Islamic ones clearly do

Ok want me to find you every single quotes from the bible that are violent? Will that make you happy and stop arguing about non sense? Ofc the bible has many more and you could easily find them as well, it's not my problem that you won't want to find them. Read this if you please: http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2009/03/08/dark_passages/?page=4

Islam is not responsible for terrorist attacks, terrorist groups are. That's like saying all Spain/Europe/christianity is responsible for the barbaric acts some people did in America, during the ww2 or during the crusades...

Raul the more i read the more i am convinced that you are trolling. Cant be that ignorant of the point we are trying to make.

Citiraj:

Islam is not responsible for terrorist attacks, terrorist groups are. That's like saying all Spain/Europe/christianity is responsible for the barbaric acts some people did in America, during the ww2 or during the crusades...

See this is why the terrorist attacks keep on coming, people like you won't accept the fact that these are islamic attacks carried out by fundamentalist muslims. Not extremist christians, muslims. You can be as politically correct as you like, but it only leads to more and more undocumented immigrants, murders and terrorist attacks.