Less SP for more funds

Prispeval The Tactician, 17.04.2014 at 04:05

Make winning 50k x0.5 sp and 25k x0.75 .

This comment got lots of support in another thread, might as well give it a shot. Tbh this idea would fix a lot of issue's and is simple to implement. So... SUPPORT!!

EDIT: Some issue's it would fix:
1. My idea would balance ranks that atm mean nothing. By making the get-fast-sp 25k+50k world games worth less, this balances the ranks by making low fund games the same value (normal SP gain) and high fund games less value (higher SP gain).
2. This would higher gameplay quality as a whole, because the SP craved people who only play to get SP will eventually realize they would get more SP by playing low fund games, therefore more players playing 3-15k and less playing 25-50k
3. Would gradually make the standard for most games 'low fund'. This would also apply to scenario's or maps such as RP and make the game (even RP) higher quality like I stated above by people playing only for the fun of it not SP.



Would be applied from rank five so the player has a basic understanding of game mechanics and micromanagement, and given a heads up to by rank 3/4 so the player is aware.


This works too:

Prispeval Safari, 17.04.2014 at 16:35

I would just support more SP if you play with less funds

No support.

I would just support more SP if you play with less funds

Support

Prispeval Safari, 17.04.2014 at 16:35

I would just support more SP if you play with less funds

This would work too

Prispeval Chess, 17.04.2014 at 17:28

Edited my post. Rest of my reply is here:
Rank limits could be set to make low ranks not clash with high ranks so soon.
As for not beginner friendly, well I put that in the OP.

EDIT: Also, why is low ranks not playing with high ranks good? That just makes them improve more. Its as you said that the 'low tolerance' players wouldn't like, where a rank limit can be set.

Heads up at rank 4? Maybe rank 3 instead? Or when they start playing?

And RP is a map not a scenario damnit

Bump