|
How bout a strategy, Iron and Blood.
For infatr, marines, soldiers. +1 everything, but weakers tanks -1 everything
What do u think?
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Ivan (Administrator)
How bout a strategy, Iron and Blood.
For infatr, marines, soldiers. +1 everything, but weakers tanks -1 everything
What do u think?
Overpowered.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
Garde Objave: 2842 od: Canada
|
How about a strategy where everything is almost perfect? All stats are fairly balanced, a la 5 atk/5 def for Tanks, 3 atk/3 def for Militia, etc?
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
I won't use then, since it doesn't fit my playstyle but it's a good option to vary the battlefield. Good job!
----
"Whenever death may surprise us, let it be welcome if our battle cry has reached even one receptive ear and another hand reaches out to take up our arms".
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Hmmm, well, could u introduce a list of medals.
I know im a little pushy, but me and some other players would realy like to see em.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Haha i liked the iron fist strategy
----
"Velvet Glove, Iron fist"
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Cool name, but I am getting owned left and right using Iron Fist. the +3 hp is not enough to offset the bonus other players get in attacking from competing strategies (e.g. Tanks on tank gen), so your units just get crushed left and right by similar size stacks. Add to that everything is +20, and -range, and you get recipe for lose. Unless I am not doing it right... Perfect defense is more effective since it reduces cost of units, doesn't reduce range, and gives you +def bonuses to infantry.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Ivan (Administrator)
Cool name, but I am getting owned left and right using Iron Fist. the +3 hp is not enough to offset the bonus other players get in attacking from competing strategies (e.g. Tanks on tank gen), so your units just get crushed left and right by similar size stacks. Add to that everything is +20, and -range, and you get recipe for lose. Unless I am not doing it right... Perfect defense is more effective since it reduces cost of units, doesn't reduce range, and gives you +def bonuses to infantry.
Right now it's +2 HP, actually. +3 HP might be necessary if the Strategy proves to be too weak.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
So we are keeping the new battle system?
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Ivan (Administrator)
So we are keeping the new battle system?
Sure. It works much better, in my opinion.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Yes, this system seems more versatile.But it still needs a few tweakings.
Learster invited me to do some test, and the hp added more in attack than in defence with the iron fist strategy.
This the "famous" balance thing I was speaking in the post about the poll.
We understand that units shouldn't be very different, but when a unit is dedicated to def, it should def better than a unit dedicated to attack. (hard to explain in english I apologize for my poor english one more time)
Keep up the good work, the system just need a few tweaks, and we'll help you to find them.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Indeed it works better, but make it so you can skip to results in individuals battles like before.
----
Beheading infidels is a patriotic duty
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Indeed it works better, but make it so you can skip to results in individuals battles like before.
You can, just click on the particular battle instead of the view all results. Or maybe I'm misunderstanding you.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Can't wait to start fisting my opponents.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Iron fisting is not good Lucifer !
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
I think he's just trolling...but yes the strategy is a definite loser. IMO it *might* be worth testing if all it did was give +2 HP to all units. The -2 range is too crippling. You can't make it anywhere in 1 turn without air transports. And the added cost is just another negative.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
Garde Objave: 2842 od: Canada
|
I think he's just trolling...but yes the strategy is a definite loser. IMO it *might* be worth testing if all it did was give +2 HP to all units. The -2 range is too crippling. You can't make it anywhere in 1 turn without air transports. And the added cost is just another negative.
I'd use it if it were +4 hp, and cheaper transports.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
I only read about those 2 strategies, what are those 8 new upgrades?
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
I wonder the same thing.. Like is there something I should be saving for our can I start using some of the SP to test a few things
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Wow frist time i know about this
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Wow frist time i know about this
This is a 2 year old update.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
Garde Objave: 2842 od: Canada
|
I think he's just trolling...but yes the strategy is a definite loser. IMO it *might* be worth testing if all it did was give +2 HP to all units. The -2 range is too crippling. You can't make it anywhere in 1 turn without air transports. And the added cost is just another negative.
To think at one point Iron Fist was considered garbage. Totally forgot my idiotic response in this thread, too.
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|
|
Prispeval Meester, 05.05.2013 at 00:04
Wow frist time i know about this
This is a 2 year old update.
LOL
Nalaganje...
Nalaganje...
|